Research Realm:Discussion archives/Galleries: Difference between revisions
more chat logs |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{blockquote | {{blockquote | ||
|author=[[User:Ringtail Raider|Ringtail Raider]] | |author=[[User:Ringtail Raider|Ringtail Raider]] 17:50, 19 June 2024 (CET) | ||
|quote= | |quote= | ||
Whats the opinion on having image galleries, either somewhere on articles or on separate pages? | Whats the opinion on having image galleries, either somewhere on articles or on separate pages? | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
{{blockquote | {{blockquote | ||
|author=[[User:Baraklava|Klavvy (Baraklava)]] | |author=[[User:Baraklava|Klavvy (Baraklava)]] 20:16, 19 June 2024 (CET) | ||
|quote= | |quote= | ||
Image galleries of what, for example? I think it is best to keep it contained within the article it's related to, spontaneously, but it depends on how you mean 🙂 | Image galleries of what, for example? I think it is best to keep it contained within the article it's related to, spontaneously, but it depends on how you mean 🙂 | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
{{blockquote | {{blockquote | ||
|author=[[User:Ringtail Raider|Ringtail Raider]] | |author=[[User:Ringtail Raider|Ringtail Raider]] 20:34, 19 June 2024 (CET) | ||
|quote= | |quote= | ||
Like if there's additional images that don't fit in the regular article text. Like development screenshots of a game for example, if there's a lot of them. A lot of wikis have those with a gallery section bear the bottom of the page or a separate gallery page if there's a lot of related images, though some of them definitely overuse it and are messy (looking at you wikia wikis). The alternative is just linking to a category containing images, which keeps articles cleaner but those cant be organized or captioned really.<br/><br/> | Like if there's additional images that don't fit in the regular article text. Like development screenshots of a game for example, if there's a lot of them. A lot of wikis have those with a gallery section bear the bottom of the page or a separate gallery page if there's a lot of related images, though some of them definitely overuse it and are messy (looking at you wikia wikis). The alternative is just linking to a category containing images, which keeps articles cleaner but those cant be organized or captioned really.<br/><br/> | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
{{blockquote | {{blockquote | ||
|author=[[User:Baraklava|Klavvy (Baraklava)]] | |author=[[User:Baraklava|Klavvy (Baraklava)]] 21:39, 19 June 2024 (CET) | ||
|quote= | |quote= | ||
I definitely think galleries would be best for that, but perhaps make it a limit? So more than, say, 3 pictures, where each picture is not essential to the article (such as a collection of game screenshots, with the intention of showing off the screenshots in general rather than highlighting a specific detail in each image) then one uses an image gallery | I definitely think galleries would be best for that, but perhaps make it a limit? So more than, say, 3 pictures, where each picture is not essential to the article (such as a collection of game screenshots, with the intention of showing off the screenshots in general rather than highlighting a specific detail in each image) then one uses an image gallery | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 06:49, 18 January 2026
Whats the opinion on having image galleries, either somewhere on articles or on separate pages?
— Ringtail Raider 17:50, 19 June 2024 (CET)
Image galleries of what, for example? I think it is best to keep it contained within the article it's related to, spontaneously, but it depends on how you mean 🙂
— Klavvy (Baraklava) 20:16, 19 June 2024 (CET)
Like if there's additional images that don't fit in the regular article text. Like development screenshots of a game for example, if there's a lot of them. A lot of wikis have those with a gallery section bear the bottom of the page or a separate gallery page if there's a lot of related images, though some of them definitely overuse it and are messy (looking at you wikia wikis). The alternative is just linking to a category containing images, which keeps articles cleaner but those cant be organized or captioned really.
I'm not a big fan of galleries tbh but I dunno what's best for stuff like that. Like to continue that example I assume we wanna gather all the dev pics of stuff possible and have it all accessible in one place. But idk
— Ringtail Raider 20:34, 19 June 2024 (CET)
I definitely think galleries would be best for that, but perhaps make it a limit? So more than, say, 3 pictures, where each picture is not essential to the article (such as a collection of game screenshots, with the intention of showing off the screenshots in general rather than highlighting a specific detail in each image) then one uses an image gallery
— Klavvy (Baraklava) 21:39, 19 June 2024 (CET)