Research Realm:Discussion archives/Galleries: Difference between revisions

From Research Realm
more chat logs
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{blockquote
{{blockquote
|author=[[User:Ringtail Raider|Ringtail Raider]] 18:50, 19 June 2024 (CET)
|author=[[User:Ringtail Raider|Ringtail Raider]] 17:50, 19 June 2024 (CET)
|quote=
|quote=
Whats the opinion on having image galleries, either somewhere on articles or on separate pages?
Whats the opinion on having image galleries, either somewhere on articles or on separate pages?
Line 8: Line 8:


{{blockquote
{{blockquote
|author=[[User:Baraklava|Klavvy (Baraklava)]] 21:16, 19 June 2024 (CET)
|author=[[User:Baraklava|Klavvy (Baraklava)]] 20:16, 19 June 2024 (CET)
|quote=
|quote=
Image galleries of what, for example? I think it is best to keep it contained within the article it's related to, spontaneously, but it depends on how you mean 🙂
Image galleries of what, for example? I think it is best to keep it contained within the article it's related to, spontaneously, but it depends on how you mean 🙂
Line 16: Line 16:


{{blockquote
{{blockquote
|author=[[User:Ringtail Raider|Ringtail Raider]] 21:34, 19 June 2024 (CET)
|author=[[User:Ringtail Raider|Ringtail Raider]] 20:34, 19 June 2024 (CET)
|quote=
|quote=
Like if there's additional images that don't fit in the regular article text. Like development screenshots of a game for example, if there's a lot of them. A lot of wikis have those with a gallery section bear the bottom of the page or a separate gallery page if there's a lot of related images, though some of them definitely overuse it and are messy (looking at you wikia wikis). The alternative is just linking to a category containing images, which keeps articles cleaner but those cant be organized or captioned really.<br/><br/>
Like if there's additional images that don't fit in the regular article text. Like development screenshots of a game for example, if there's a lot of them. A lot of wikis have those with a gallery section bear the bottom of the page or a separate gallery page if there's a lot of related images, though some of them definitely overuse it and are messy (looking at you wikia wikis). The alternative is just linking to a category containing images, which keeps articles cleaner but those cant be organized or captioned really.<br/><br/>
Line 25: Line 25:


{{blockquote
{{blockquote
|author=[[User:Baraklava|Klavvy (Baraklava)]] 22:39, 19 June 2024 (CET)
|author=[[User:Baraklava|Klavvy (Baraklava)]] 21:39, 19 June 2024 (CET)
|quote=
|quote=
I definitely think galleries would be best for that, but perhaps make it a limit? So more than, say, 3 pictures, where each picture is not essential to the article (such as a collection of game screenshots, with the intention of showing off the screenshots in general rather than highlighting a specific detail in each image) then one uses an image gallery
I definitely think galleries would be best for that, but perhaps make it a limit? So more than, say, 3 pictures, where each picture is not essential to the article (such as a collection of game screenshots, with the intention of showing off the screenshots in general rather than highlighting a specific detail in each image) then one uses an image gallery
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 06:49, 18 January 2026

Whats the opinion on having image galleries, either somewhere on articles or on separate pages?

— Ringtail Raider 17:50, 19 June 2024 (CET)


Image galleries of what, for example? I think it is best to keep it contained within the article it's related to, spontaneously, but it depends on how you mean 🙂

— Klavvy (Baraklava) 20:16, 19 June 2024 (CET)


Like if there's additional images that don't fit in the regular article text. Like development screenshots of a game for example, if there's a lot of them. A lot of wikis have those with a gallery section bear the bottom of the page or a separate gallery page if there's a lot of related images, though some of them definitely overuse it and are messy (looking at you wikia wikis). The alternative is just linking to a category containing images, which keeps articles cleaner but those cant be organized or captioned really.

I'm not a big fan of galleries tbh but I dunno what's best for stuff like that. Like to continue that example I assume we wanna gather all the dev pics of stuff possible and have it all accessible in one place. But idk

— Ringtail Raider 20:34, 19 June 2024 (CET)


I definitely think galleries would be best for that, but perhaps make it a limit? So more than, say, 3 pictures, where each picture is not essential to the article (such as a collection of game screenshots, with the intention of showing off the screenshots in general rather than highlighting a specific detail in each image) then one uses an image gallery

— Klavvy (Baraklava) 21:39, 19 June 2024 (CET)