Research Realm:Discussion archives/Content to include

Probably the number one question I have, since this is a Lego focused project: What's the best way to handle set articles? I remember hearing someone complain about Brickipedia (among many things) that it having a page for every single set ever was unnecessary when things like Brickset already exist, and since hearing that I kinda agreed and wondered what the best way to fix that would be.

Should all set pages be separate even if there's not much info on them, and also separate from articles about the things in the set? Like would the pages for the Chrome Crusher vehicle and Chrome Crusher set be separate, or could the set be a section on the vehicle page? I guess that'd be a problem with 4930 and 4990 though since they're not any one thing in particular. With Rock Raiders I guess it's complicated since there's more to say about the vehicles in the games and such. Or like the Kabaya sets for instance, would there be a page for each or one for all four plus all the combiner stuff? Would all the Mini Heroes sets go on their own pages or just one page?

With other themes there's also stuff like how some sets had multiple set numbers but were pretty much the same set, or some sets having remakes that are new sets but essentially the same "thing" if that makes sense.

Sorry if this is sorta rambling, hope it makes sense, just wanted to ask this because obviously focusing on sets is important but I don't want this to be like Brickipedia either.

— Ringtail Raider, 17 January 2023

---

I hear ya. Reading the original post in this channel I was left thinking "that sounds like a ton of work". 😅

No need to reinvent the wheel. If we can link to Bricklink when appropriate, I'd say do it.

— R.R. Slugger, 17 January 2023

---

I don't mind the work and don't mind the idea of separate set pages (would be necessary for 4990 at least), just not sure to what extent

— Ringtail Raider, 17 January 2023

---

If there is nothing more to say on the set, definitely just link to Brickset (not Brickipedia I think - their articles can be pretty messy and Brickset has more verified info)

I think if there is anything else to say about the set, it's a good idea to give it a separate page. For Rock Raiders, you'd be interested in how they work in the PC game, for example, so that's more info needed. For some sets, perhaps there are prototypes of the set that would be nice to feature. Many sets though, won't have much to add to a separate page

That said... have you guys seen the website https://www.backoftheboxbuilds.com/ ? It is unfortunately very messy, but this is something I'd love to have that's missing from the broader internet. Just pictures the box of each set in high-resolution. It would make a ton of sense to have them available in a wiki rather than a separate website just for boxes, right? And that would warrant a Wiki page for sure I think

But all of that is not very high priority, it's something that I want to do eventually. Getting a complete archive would take a lot of time. Or, if someone would have access to the Lego Vault...

You guys are more into Rock Raiders and the PC games - so I think you should focus on expanding those pages in the meantime. Things like

• A main page for each game, with information on levels and things in the game
• How to run the game (A separate page, optimally)
• How to mod the game (A separate page, that then points to separate pages on modding specific parts)
• Betas, prototypes and cut content of the game perhaps, though that is widely covered my TCRF

Again, the Realm is a vision of mine that is a bit fuzzy, and you work on the parts of the Wiki that you want. For example I would be interested in cataloguing how many mould numbers there are for each part, and when they were produced, and... everyone else probably doesn't lol. As long as it's detailed nerd information, it goes!

— Klavvy (Baraklava), 17 January 2023

---

Oh yeah I forgot the boxes, and alt builds, guess that'd make more sense on a set page than just a vehicle page.

I don't think the mold numbers is a bad idea.

That all sounds good, including the cut content - TCRF is lacking on LRR content right now anyway so stuff could be copied to there.

— Ringtail Raider, 17 January 2023

---

For now I think it's best to focus on work that is not on any Wiki, if that sums it up? Running LRR is a RRU guide, it needs a Wiki page that can be maintained, modding LRR is spread across many RRU guides, that needs a nice Wiki page/hierarchy of pages on how to mod specific aspects of the game

TCRF focuses on cut content, sure, but I'd for example want a Wiki page discussing how to perhaps implement/activate cut content (like the Spiders and scorpions) and not just being a list of things that were cut. Trying to relate it back to the game etc, and focus on what the TCRF does not do, but Lego nerds like us would want to know

Anything that has to do with physical Lego is just my brain wanting to catalogue everything about Lego as a company and producer xD I guess the crazy end goal is having concrete info and references about most parts going back to the 1950's, things like how their processes evolved, when they changed up their colours, things like that that I think other Wikis don't cover properly. I know it's not what most of the former RRU crowd has focused on though, but it's a passion of mine and I have a ton of production prototypes and mould tests, as well as a lot of insight in the process on how a part goes from concept to production... or information that not even Lego has catalogued because they didn't think anyone would be interested

— Klavvy (Baraklava), 17 January 2023

---

I guess it's best to start and see what works best. I'm all for as much info as possible, it's mostly just the way Brickipedia does sets I don't like.

— Ringtail Raider, 17 January 2023